Not an expert talking. Just a
rambler.
Ah, the bane of every writer.
Mary-Sues. Or, in my case, the male counterpart, Gary-Stus. So, if you don’t
know what a Mary-Sue is, let’s copy-paste a description off TVTropes.com: “She's exceptionally talented in an
implausibly wide variety of areas, and may possess skills that are rare or
nonexistent in the canon setting. She also lacks any realistic, or at least
story-relevant, character flaws — either that or her "flaws" are
obviously meant to be endearing… In other words, the term "Mary Sue"
is generally slapped on a character who is important in the story, possesses
unusual physical traits, and has an irrelevantly over-skilled or over-idealized
nature.”
(I almost lost myself in there.
That site is addictive.)
So she’s the vision of perfection.
You’d probably think these characters would be easy to spot. They’re not.
They’re easy to spot if you’re an objective reader, but it’s damn hard to
realize it of your own character.
I actually didn’t realize I had
Mary-Sues and Gary-Stus (oh, the fuck, I’ll just keep calling them Sues,
applicable to both male and female) until I took the Mary-Sue litmus test. I
recommend it. Or, you can just read through my post. I recommend that more.
Let’s take Character A. Character
A’s not that great, I mean, he has flaws– he’s cold and cruel, he can’t love
anyone, and he has no problem manipulating and controlling people. Now, just
try and look closely– do you really think those are flaws? How many can you
look at and actually frown? Do you not secretly believe those are all really
cool attributes?
You might want to try writing down
each specific trait of your characters. Don’t bother separating the traits into
good or bad, just write them down. Sues will usually have an unbelievably long
line of good qualities, usually about how gorgeous or smart the character is.
Sues are usually characters we’d
secretly like to be. For female authors, this usually means their Sue is strong
and independent, sexy and alluring to men. Female authors are usually the
culprits of Gary-Stus (like… me). These are male characters we’d love to date. They’re
very good-looking (obviously!), intelligent and strong, with an inner romantic
side. Male authors also create Mary-Sues quite frequently, though I’ve hardly
come across Gary-Stus created by men. Unless they’ve been created specifically
to appeal to female audiences.
Ah, fuck it. Just go to the
Mary-Sue Litmus Test, because I couldn’t even recognize my own Sues without it.
Identified your Sue? Okay. Now
it’s time to fix your Sue. And believe me, all Sues need to be fixed. Well,
unless they’re background characters, and don’t have much screen-time. If not,
time to fix.
One of the Sues I’d discovered was
Rinna, younger sister to Ruki, who I mentioned last How Not to Write a Book
post. She got the most points in the test, even more than Ruki (who I suspected
might be a Gary Stu right from the beginning, but refused to admit it). Mainly
because she falls in category A of Sues– she’s the one I’d love to be. She’s
the most beautiful woman, with long, shiny black hair and purple eyes. She’s
pretty enough to be considered flawless by Shay, who’s unbelievably picky and
has really sharp eyes. She’s intelligent, and rich, and she’s good with swords and herbs, as she and her brother are
deadly assassins– the best in the land. She’s sickeningly good, but as most of
the Mary-Sues I’d encountered before were usually the strong, tomboyish type, I
really didn’t think Rinna was one.
You can just decide right then which qualities you’d like to change or
dump. After failing the Litmus Test miserably,
I decided right then to scrap Rinna’s skill with sword. I then looked at her ‘flaws’–
the nice traits about her that I’d tried to hide as flaws. Okay, so she’s
supposed to be really close to her brother, and be close to no-one else. How
about making her really dependent on her brother? Not just jealous for her
brother’s affection or anything like that, but really dependent? Unable to
properly function without his orders.
If you’re writing a Sue that you’d
like to be, you should consider writing in your own flaws. You should be able
to name at least three right off the bat. Prideful, lazy, bitchy… those would
be my three big ones. If you can’t name even one without thinking hard about
it, then doom on you. Doom on you!
I can’t write more on this subject
just yet, since I’m still struggling with it myself. If you have any tips, then
please leave a comment. Thank you!
No comments:
Post a Comment